Today, a couple of PET 8032 boards in for repair. The first is one of those where I get worried as soon as I see the board.
This one has had a lot of work done to it already. That's usually not a good sign. Many chips have been replaced, others show signs of corrosion and water damage. This one's had a hard life.
The ROMs have all been socketed and some replaced, as has the video RAM and most of the 244 buffers.
This one's not booting, black screen, no sync, so the 6545 hasn't been initialised. You rarely see the garbage screen on these later PETs as the 6545 generates the video sync, so it only works when the PET has started to boot. Early PETs had a series of counters fed from the system clock, so they would generate a video output with no ROM or RAM and even with no CPU.
It looks like this has already been replaced (by a 6845 which is backwardly compatible), as has the 6502, a Rockwell from 1980 rather than a MOS from 1982 as it would have been. Over to the PET diagnostics, and yes we are getting video out, so the 6545 is OK.
Oh dear, that doesn't look good. It is showing 12 of the 16 RAM chips have failed, one of the video RAM is bad, and only two of the ROM chips are reading correctly. Since some of the RAM is reading correctly, it's probably not going to be the RAM address buffering or refresh counters. Power supply is often the cause of such a wide ranging failure, the -5V and 12V rail both only being required by the RAM. The supply rails were all reading correctly, but maybe a previous power problem had taken out the RAM. There are also signs of corrosion, had this thing been running whilst submerged?
This era of boards had a very annoying construction technique, all the chip legs seem to be cut short and bent over. This makes desoldering them a real pain, and so although removing and replacing all the RAM would probably be the best option, it would be rather expensive in terms of time as well as the limited availability of new-old-stock 4116 chips.
A ROM/RAM board seemed an easier option at this point, and it did resolve the issues of both the faulty RAM and the partly faulty ROMs. The only thing it can't address is the video RAM, but that just needed a replacement 2114 RAM and that fixed the issue.
A quick test and the keyboard was working, and it was loading from tape. I try not to put things back in the box as soon as I see signs of life, as it's not always that simple. And indeed in this case, it wasn't. After a while it appeared to lock up, and when reset, it started showing random keypresses from the keyboard. I checked nothing was leaning on the keys, and even unplugged the keyboard. Hmm, looks like the 6520 has failed.
I replaced that, and it was working again, keyboard reading correctly. I started further testing, the IEEE-488 port wasn't working, showing errors on both data (the rear 6520) and NDAC and ATN (the 6522). Then it locked up again. And this time when I reset it, the beep noise was wrong. Oh great, the 6522 has gone as well. I removed and socketed both of those. The beep was now right, but the keyboard was messed up again, so I fitted second new keyboard 6520.
Once again, the keyboard was back to working, and the IEEE-488 was almost there, still a fault on NDAC, which looked to be more likely a 3446 buffer. Before I got around to fixing that. It locked up and the keyboard went funny again. OK, at this point, all three 6520/6522 chips had been replaced, and were working, but I was reluctant to fit another. Time for a different approach. It seems something on the databus must have a faulty enable line and is enabling itself, or is being enabled at the wrong time, and is causing a bus conflict, as this thing appears to be killing chips.
One of the likely causes of things being enabled at the wrong time is the 74154 which provides 16 enable lines, one for each block of 4K in the system, but I see that has already been replaced. All the ROMs, and the 244 buffers which provide the buffered databus for the video circuitry had already been removed, socketed and replaced, so I removed those, and also took out all the 40 pin chips.
I was going to start testing with a NOP generator, but first I thought I'd check that there was nothing untoward with the clock and control signals and nothing pulling the busses high or low.
Then I looked at the D6 line. Hmm, that's not right. It was a regular pulse permanently on the D6 line at about 15.6KHz (1MHz/64 ?). All the others were floating as expected, but this was being actively driven. The only thing left connected to D6 at this point was the RAM. Even with no CPU, that was being refreshed, and although I couldn't see any of the address lines at that sort of speed, they were all faster as part of the refresh cycles. I did find a 15.625KHz pulse on one of the outputs of the refresh address counter, so it was presumably a multiple of the update rate, pulling high for 63 of every 64 refresh cycles or something like that. So it looks like one of the RAM chips was indeed faulty and without being asked was constantly writing to the databus, fighting with anything else trying to drive the bus. This being a CMOS device, it would have been a FET pulling it high to 5V, not just a weak resistor like a TTL output, so this thing could have been responsible for damaging half the chips on the board.
Removing the two 4116 RAM chips attached to the D6 line, the 15KHz signal had gone and all looked well. I put the new chips back in place and retested. I had replaced the 3446 buffer, and now the IEEE-488 was working as well. I went back and retried all the previous 6520 and 6522 chips, and unfortunately, all apart from one 6520 were showing faults now. Whilst the system hadn't been booting, they hadn't been writing to the bus, but as soon as it booted and they started writing to the databus and fighting with the RAM chip, their outputs drivers must have been damaged.
The board has now been running all morning, no signs of any further problems, I think the culprits have been found.
The second one also showed signs of previous work, although I was less worried on this occasion, as I had done the work. This was from an 8096, but is the same board as the 8032, the 64K RAM board having been removed.
This board had previously had a couple of unusual RAM faults, including some unusual ones which led to me writing more and more RAM testing routines until I traced that down.
Now it was showing various errors which pointed to the 6520 or 6522, including sometimes not booting, some random keyboard activity, and jumping to the machine code monitor. Could it be that, or given this machines history, could it be RAM again?
The chips weren't socketed, so I didn't want to go straight for changing them. I did some testing with PET diagnostics again (this time on the LCD version as my screenshots from the previous board were so awful). Some of the time it was reading ok, but I was seeing some occasional errors. One bit in the lower bank of RAM would occasionally fail on power on, but was otherwise fine. The other occasionally failed after running for a while.
Two intermittent RAM chips. Possibly doing the same thing as on the previous board, but not easy to see here as I couldn't remove the other chips to check.
It was clear the RAM was faulty, so I removed the two fault chips and fitted some new (well, new old stock) 4116s chips. It's a judgement call at this point, 7 of 16 RAM chips have now failed, is it time to remove them all and replace the full set? or remove them and fit a ROM/RAM board? For the moment, I replaced the new newly faulty chips. With those replaced, the symptoms all seem to have gone, a long soak test with the 8296 diagnostics program showed no more errors.
Today we have a couple of Commodore 3032 (2001N-32) board repairs, with some unusual problems. The first has a couple of intermittent issues. Firstly, the display occasionally drops down to half width, with the ready prompt appearing in the middle of the screen. It also has a tendency to lock up, sometimes after a few minutes, sometimes it will last an hour, and occasionally drops to lower case before doing so.
When powered on, all looked well, all the ROMs and RAM appeared to be working. I ran this for a while and eventually saw both problems. As ever when looking at a new board, my eye was drawn to some previous repair work. The 74LS08 at UH10 had been socketed and replaced. This is part of the frame counter / sync generation circuitry, so could well be the cause of the intermittent display fault.
Although it looked a similar vintage to the rest of the board, I don't think it was as original as the other 74LS08 chips on the board are marked F (Fairchild?) not Texas Instruments, and there was flux residue on the back of the board.
The pins on the chip were tarnished, so I sanded them to get a better contact and replaced the chip. It ran for quite a while, but the half screen problem did come back (between a few lockups). Ah the fun of testing intermittent faults.The chip had tested OK, but I tried a replacement anyway, and again it ran for a while and eventually showed the problem again.
I suspected it might be a bad contact on the socket, so I removed the socket and soldered the chip directly the board, and that sorted it. The board has run for probably a couple of days since then and that half screen display problem has not showed up again. It did keep locking up through.
Testing with PET diagnostics, it ran flawlessly all day. So there were no issues with the ROM chips or the RAM, they were all working fine, and kept passing all the tests, but as soon as I went back to a 6502, the lockups returned.
I tried various 6502 chips, also removing or replacing the 6520s and 6522. Taking those four chips and running them in another 3032 board, they also ran all day without a problem, so it wasn't the chips, it was something on the board. Nothing was running hot (at least nothing that wouldn't normally run hot).
I turned again to the sockets. The white single white IC sockets are generally a bit rubbish, and I have had problems in the past, usually with intermittent contacts on the ROM chip sockets, but these had continued to pass the tests. A trick I have used in the past is to push a turned pin IC socket into the white socket, and put the chip into that. The pins on the turned pin socket are a lot thicker than a normal IC, so it's not recommended, as it bends the contacts away. In doing that though, it does usually make a good contact with them. I tried installing an extra socket for the 6502, and in ran for a good few hours, but finally locked up again. Power cycling at this point brought up the monitor program, often a sign that the 6522 is faulty, so I double socketed that as well, and this time it ran for 6 hours without a problem.
side note: the missing chip is the 6520 which is used for the IEEE-488 port, you can run the PET fine without that, you are just limited to loading from tape, so I removed it to simplify things. And yes, I put big labels on my test chips to make it easy to identify them. Have you got a problem with that?
Excellent, I think the issue has been located. It's probably not the best idea to leave the double sockets in place, so I removed all four 40 pin sockets (since two had problems, I wouldn't trust the other two).
I have found in the past these can be tricky to desolder as they tend to hold into the tracks on the top of the board and can lift tracks or pads if you're not careful.
I have found the safest way to remove them is the carefully lift off the plastic cover and desolder the pins one by one. You can see how the sockets 'work' quite clearly here. The pin is a bent bit of metal with a bit of a spring to it, and the pin sits between the plastic body and the bent bit of the pin.
Here you can see the arrangement with the cover removed. It doesn't take much to imagine one of those pins might not be pushing enough, or thermal expansion might move things just enough to break the contact.
One of the pins from a white socket from that PET board is on the left. I referred to these as 'single wipe', so a single contact point with the chip leg. On the right is a modern 'double wipe' contact, where the pin also includes a side section and the chip left is held between the two points of contact, which is usually more reliable.
I prefer to use turned pin sockets, which have three or four points of contact and seem far more reliable. With those four sockets replaced, and the original chips installed, the board ran for most of a day with no problems, and again for several hours the next day after a cold start.
You can never say conclusively an intermittent fault has been fixed, but this board seems solid now, and I am happy to send it back. Unusually, with all its original chips intact and working.
Time for a bit of a break before we move onto the next board. You can drink your weak lemon drink.....now.
The second board was showing a garbage screen, the usual symptom if the PET hasn't 'booted up', if the CPU has not been able to run the instructions in ROM, which very early on clear the screen. Instead, the screen shows the contents of the video RAM, which is just the random state of uninitialised static RAM.
It looked like it was going to be easy, as soon as I opened the box, I could see the ROM chips were in the wrong order.
Or rather, there was an EPROM (of the wrong size) in UD9, and that chip was in socket UD5. Nice and easy, swap those around, quick test and I can finish early today. Well, no, that was never going to happen, was it. Better run the diagnostics first, just to check they are alright.
Oh, that's not good. You can see the EPROM is empty (confirmed in EPROM programmer), and the F000 ROM chip is on the wrong place (in D5). It also shows the ROM in socket D4 is faulty.
I initially read that number as 901474-04, which is the editor ROM chip from a PET 8032. But no, it's actually 901472-04. This is a ROM chip from a Commodore printer.
It may seem odd to have a printer ROM chip in there, but those chips were occasionally to be found inside PETs, normally with black paint on them to hide the number, as shown on the top chip in that photo. They were presumably bought cheap from Commodore, and were sold as security keys with the Visicalc software. It would check certain bytes in that ROM chip to see if the user had bought a licensed version of the product. This one doesn't look like it's been painted, so may have been someone cheating the system.
Same markings on the rear, but unfortunately it is not working, returning intermittent results and running a bit warm, so has been removed. With that removed, the results were the same. The display was messed up a bit, usually indication a video RAM fault, and indeed, it was showing an issue with bit 6 of the video RAM, and bit 7 of the lower bank of main RAM. That would explain why it wasn't booting.
I fitted a video RAM replacement board, which uses a modern RAM chip instead of 2114 chips, which are more difficult to get hold of. That last lot I bought about 75% were faulty.
Seeing ebay listings like this with chips on nice staticy carpet may go someway to explaining it, as would the cling film they will probably arrive wrapped in.
With the video RAM replaced, the screen was clear, and I noticed another issue it had detected, reset line stuck high. I'll sort that later. At the moment, the main issue is bit 7 of the main RAM is still faulty.
Looking at the RAM, one of the chips is socketed. Can you guess which one? I swapped in a known working 4116 chip, but it was still failing. Checking continuity, three or four of the address lines were not making contact on the chip. Another bad socket? Well, I though that, then I looked under the board. I was obviously so horrified, I neglected to take a proper photo of that. Several of the pins had blobs of solder on them, but were not actually making contact with anything, the pads having fallen off. I removed that and cleaned up that board, and also removed the chip next to it (properly, without doing the sort of damage as the last person who had worked on this board).
With the board cleaned, I could see one track had been lifted and two pads damaged on the top, and on the bottom, half of the pads had falled off, clearly the through hole plating had come off when the original chip had been removed (apparently using a claw hammer or similar implement).
As most of the tracks are on the top side of the board, I decided to solder the chip back in, so I can make sure each pin was soldered to its track. I used a small wire to replace the missing track. The RAM chip beside it and the 74S04 were removed to give easier access to solder the chip in from the top of the board (there was nothing to solder to below).
You can see there are now 8 pads are missing, a extra few were loose and not connected to anything, so they were removed. You can see the scorching to the board where the previous repairer had used too high a heat.
I actually put the chip which was originally bit 6 in the spot where the damage had been done, as that was a matching chip to the rest of the set. I didn't have an identical one, so I fitted one with similar specs where the bit 6 chip had been (in case it had to be changed later, as that would be a lot easier to remove).With those replaced, running the diagnostics again, all was well, and the PET was booting.
I ran that for a while, and a few power cycles later I noticed the keyboard wasn't working. Ah yes, the reset line was stuck high.
I confirmed this on the scope, the reset line was going high at the same time as the 5V line, so there was no low pulse which should be there to correctly initialise the chips. The reset circuit is a fairly reliable one, a 555 timer which generates a one second pulse which is then inverted and buffered. I used this same circuit on my CPU, Clock and Reset board for the RC2014.
On the PET, the 555 wasn't firing, and checking the two RC circuits, it seems the 1uF capacitor was open circuit. Ah, tantalum bead capacitors, my second least favourite capacitor (behind the RIFA brand mains filter capacitors). These have a tendency to fail, sometimes you're lucky like this one, and they fail open circuit, it is like they are not there. Other times, they fail short and go bang eventually if across a power rail. Nasty, evil blobby things, they should be banned.
Luckily, the Commodore engineers provided pads for two types of capacitors, the other being an axial ceramic capacitor (like I use on the RC2014 board), so I fitted one of those instead, and the reset pulse was present once more.
When testing these boards, I often use a BASIC memory test program. I've updated this several times, so it now tests quite a lot of things, so is quite slow, but that's often quite handy as it takes about an hour to run, so is a bit of a stability test as well.
More soak testing and several power cycles, and there is another 3032 board back up and running.